The Unfinished Therapist: Living With Uncertainty in an Age of Endless Clinical Innovation

Guest Blog Post by Dr. Rachel Rashkin

This piece of writing is not about certainty. It is not about the promises any modality carries, but about what becomes possible when we stop waiting for certainty before engaging fully with life. Human beings do not heal because uncertainty disappears. On the contrary, tolerating uncertainty, being able to hold the “not knowing” in life, can be incredibly freeing. Therapists do not succeed in guiding their clients towards growth because they are certain about a case conceptualization, theory, or therapeutic tool. Those things are important. But people heal, in large part, because they discover they can remain in relationship with themselves, others, and with life, even when uncertainty remains. Like most people, I did not arrive at this understanding neatly, through a rigorous graduate program, exploring theory, meaningful conversation, or spiritual awakening. Rather, I arrived at it through the hard task of living.  

A psychotherapy landscape of endless clinical innovation

In the world of clinical practice, there is a seemingly endless stream of theories, modalities, in-person and virtual workshops and trainings, podcasts, books, research, conferences, not to mention multiple clinical perspectives. Within each modality, there are detours off the highway, with flavors leaning toward the relational, somatic, cognitive, not to mention the integration of various modalities. We have access to so much information; it is overwhelming. The development of AI has introduced yet another layer, something I’m learning to manage in my professional life, as some clients walk in with printouts of their own case conceptualization (which often is eerily spot on), “best” treatment paths, and diagnoses. It’s wild. Suffice it to say, the information at our disposal and the various streams of psychotherapy models have enriched our understanding of human suffering in ways that would have been unimaginable only a few decades ago. I have wondered, though, if alongside these valuable theories and treatments, some of us carry a quieter and less discussed clinical load: the experience of never quite feeling finished, never quite feeling like “enough” in a profession that continuously expands what it means to be attuned, insightful, skilled, talented, accomplished, competent, an “expert.” 

The psychotherapy landscape does not only function as a space for learning, but for some, especially those prone to imposter syndrome or whose childhood wounds surrounded not being good enough, intelligent enough, etc., it potentially becomes a psychologically charged field of comparison and implicit evaluation. Conferences, for example, can be wonderful, rich spaces for learning and networking, and they can also quietly become arenas for implicit comparison. Trainings and workshops become not only educational and experiential environments but can also quietly function as micro-tests of adequacy. The louder voices can become not just leaders and experts in particular modalities, but they may evolve into internalized standards of legitimacy. More than all of that, however, each time a new modality is developed, it can carry an implicit suggestion, even for advanced clinicians, that one’s current way of working is somehow incomplete. 

Let’s look at a straightforward example many clinicians have encountered: A client presents with a phobia. Should we conceptualize and treat through the lens of:

  • attachment
  • trauma
  • memory networks 
  • parts work
  • maladaptive schemas
  • or conditioned fear responses? 

Or all of the above since, putting semantics aside, there’s quite a bit of overlap in interventions?

Most clinicians are going to approach their work according to their skill set, which ideally should be what they are passionate about, what resonates with them, what feels most authentic. But increased knowledge and skill sets can sometimes increase uncertainty. Many clinicians enter the profession believing that competence will eventually yield confidence, and most often, it does. After a certain number of years, and with enough experience, supervision, consultation, reading, and training, many of us do feel relatively secure in the work we do. For others, the more they learn, the more aware they become of alternative ways of understanding the same clinical profiles, which can begin to feel overwhelming, even maddening. What initially feels like confidence can gradually morph into clinical discernment within ambiguity. This ambiguity can create a subtle form of professional experience that is rarely named: the quiet erosion of felt uncertainty. Not uncertainty about theory or practice alone, but uncertainty about one’s own clinical sense of knowing.  

Reframing uncertainty

From an EMDR-informed perspective, this internal experience might best be understood through the analogy of the negative cognition (NC) vs positive cognition (PC). NC: I am uncertain. Not simply uncertainty about knowledge, but about one’s own clinical judgment and intuition. Can I trust my clinical knowledge if I am not aligned with the most current, trending, or visible frameworks in the field? Over time, this sense of uncertainty can become subtly reinforced by the very environments designed to support learning, instead of signaling evaluation. Each new model, integration of models, or way of thinking about a particular clinical profile may implicitly suggest that somewhere there is a better clinical map, a more precise and effective intervention, a more sophisticated way of understanding human change and growth. What begins as professional development can slowly become a background experience of comparison. Within this Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) frame, the adaptive shift is not certainty, necessarily, but something more anchored, embodied, and sustainable. PC: Uncertainty can be tolerable and even good. This belief is not a rejection of evidence-based practice, nor a dismissal of clinical innovation, but a shift in the therapist’s relationship to not knowing. Uncertainty becomes something that can be embraced, rather than something that must be resolved in order to feel competent, which is a wonderful skill to model for clients. 

The overlap of learning and self-evaluation

I sat in a conference hall recently, phone open to jot down notes, surrounded by several colleagues I respect deeply. On the surface, I was listening and integrating new ideas. But alongside that process, another layer of attention was running in parallel: less conscious, more implicit. I was not only attempting to absorb what I was learning, but I was tracking myself in relation to it. Not overtly or deliberately, but through a subtle background appraisal: 

  • Would I have conceptualized this in this way?
  • Do I even agree or like conceptualizing in this way?
  • Do my personal and professional values align with this new information?
  • Everyone seems so excited and energized.
  • Am I missing something others are understanding more deeply, more fully? 

The interesting thing is, absolutely nothing in the environment demanded these thoughts. And yet it was happening. And, I suspect I was far from the only one. This, perhaps, is one of the less visible experiences of contemporary clinical training: learning and self-evaluation unfolding simultaneously, resulting in knowledge acquisition fusing quietly with identity appraisal.  

The messiness of uncertainty

As a psychologist, I have witnessed time and time again how much human suffering emerges from our struggle with uncertainty. Most of us feel relieved with guarantees, explanations, coherent narratives. We want the map. Yet life keeps handing us messy and unexpected territory, with no compass. Part of healing happens when we continue showing up, loving, creating, grieving, adjusting, risking, and connecting when certainty fails to arrive. As a convert to Orthodox Judaism at the tender age of 13, I live with uncertainty daily. I’m not fully inside, nor fully outside. But I’m also not entirely lost. I am a convert who never completely landed, spiritually, and a therapist who remains incomplete. I am a mother working exceptionally hard to raise Orthodox Jewish children while carrying questions I cannot answer, and don’t necessarily want to. I am a woman standing with one foot inside a tradition and one foot outside it, still searching for a language spacious enough to hold both. For decades, I believed the goal was resolution. Lately, I wonder whether belonging is not a destination but a relationship with one’s ever-evolving Self, of staying open-hearted despite disappointment, open-minded despite disagreement; actively choosing life again and again.  

So, the question is not how to eliminate uncertainty. Life is beautiful, messy, complicated, and most of us live somewhere in the middle. The questions are really, how to relate to uncertainty, how to develop enough theoretical flexibility without becoming splintered or wedded, and to not turn every new way of practicing psychotherapy into evidence of inadequacy. The reality is such that there will never be a final, complete map of the human psyche. There never was, and there likely never will be. From this standpoint, “certainty” in psychotherapy may involve a subtle but significant shift: moving from a search for the “correct” model to a capacity to remain present and effective within multiple, sometimes competing, models. The goal was never to master everything but to know enough, remain humble, balanced, curious, inquisitive, and to continue showing up for the people who trust us with their stories in ways that feel authentic to who we are as human beings. Perhaps “the Unfinished Therapist” is not the therapist who still has more to learn, but rather the therapist who has finally stopped expecting or hoping for certainty before allowing themselves to practice with authenticity and confidence. 

 

Dr. Rachel Rashkin is a clinical psychologist in Israel. Rashkin is known for integrating clinical rigor with creativity, drawing on music, movement, and lived experience to deepen understanding and enhance therapeutic practice. She teaches clinicians internationally, is the director of an EMDR 2.0 Intensive Treatment Program and pioneers the global AIP-In-Action Research Initiative. When not wearing her clinical hat, she can usually be found baking chocolate chip cookies with her five kids.

 

 

Back to Focal Point Blog Homepage(opens in new tab)

 

Additional Resources

If you are a therapist interested in the EMDR training:

If you are EMDR trained:

If you are an EMDRIA™ Member:

 

Date
September 18, 2026

Contributor(s)
Rachel Rashkin

Practice & Methods
Your EMDR Practice

Audience
EMDR Therapists

Language
English

Content Type
Blog/Blog Post

Access Type
Open Access

Related Articles