Comparing the effectiveness of narrative therapy and EMDR-GTEP protocols in the treatment of post traumatic stress in children exposed to humanitarian crises
This study analyzed data to compare two trauma treatments: EMDR-based G-TEP and narrative therapy for children in Central African Republic.
Article Abstract
“Background: The mental health of children living in humanitarian crisis situations is a major issue. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) causes great psychological suffering and has negative consequences on children’s development. The aim of the study was to analyse retrospective data collected in a mental health and psychosocial support program for children in the Central African Republic, and to compare results of two trauma-focused treatment interventions: the narrative protocol ACF/KONO, and the EMDR-based G-TEP. Both protocols are proposed in a group setting and led by para-professionals.
Methods: In the program, 884 children attended a psychoeducation session and after that, 661 children (290 for ACF/KONO and 371 for G-TEP) benefited from all treatment sessions. PTSD was measured by the Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES-8). General distress was measured by the Child Psychosocial Distress Screener (CPDS). Data were collected before and after treatment, and for 185 children were measured 5 months after the end of treatment.
Results: Participants ACF/KONO shows a significant reduction on CRIES-8 (t = 44.8; p < 0.001, effect size = 2.63) and CPDS (t = 38.2; p < 0.001, effect size = 2.24). Participants to the G-TEP protocol shows a significant effect with reduced scores on the CRIES-8 (t = 49.2; p < 0.001, effect size = 2.55) and CPDS (t = 57.2; p < 0.001, effect size = 2.97). Student’s t-test comparing the two groups ACF/KONO and G-TEP shows no significant difference between the two types of treatment between pre-and post-treatment for CRIES-8 scores (t = 1.744; p = 0.514, effect size = 0.040), and CPDS scores (t = 1.688; p= 0.092, effect size = 0.323). Analysis of the follow-up data for the 185 children shows that the effects of both protocols are maintained over time with mean scores at post-treatment and follow up below the clinical cut-off for both CPDS (< 8) and CRIES-8 (< 17).
Conclusions: Both protocols have been shown to be effective in reducing traumatic symptoms in children exposed to conflict; they can be conducted by para-professionals and used in humanitarian crisis situations.”
—Description from publisher
Article Access
Open Access
Dozio, E., Bizouerne, C., Wamba, V., & Atienza, N. (2024). Comparing the effectiveness of narrative therapy and EMDR-GTEP protocols in the treatment of post traumatic stress in children exposed to humanitarian crises. Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3:1320688. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1320688
Date
May 24, 2024
Creator(s)
Elisabetta Dozio, Cécile Bizouerne, Valdes Wamba
Contributor(s)
Ninon Atienza
Topics
Tragedies
Client Population
Children
Practice & Methods
Comparative Studies, Group
Extent
15 pages
Publisher
Frontiers
Rights
© 2024 Dozio, Bizouerne, Wamba and Atienza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
APA Citation
Dozio, E., Bizouerne, C., Wamba, V., & Atienza, N. (2024). Comparing the effectiveness of narrative therapy and EMDR-GTEP protocols in the treatment of post traumatic stress in children exposed to humanitarian crises. Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3:1320688. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1320688
Audience
EMDR Therapists
Content Type
Article, Peer-Reviewed