Evaluation of a trauma therapy programme within emergency service organizations

Occupational health practitioners in emergency services are exposed to higher levels of physical/psychological trauma & need trauma therapy.

Article Abstract

“Background: Occupational health practitioners working in emergency services, where employees are exposed to a higher level of physical or psychological trauma, need to be able to access trauma therapy programmes which are economically viable and effective in reducing post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Aims: The aim of this review is to provide evidence on benefits of a short-term organizational programme of trauma therapy using NICE (2018) [1] recommended interventions.

Methods: The review examined the pre- and post-therapy clinical scores from 429 emergency service professionals (ESPs) who were employed in five police forces, two fire and two ambulance services. The ESPs in higher risk roles were in a psychological surveillance programme, with those found to be experiencing clinically significant levels of trauma-related symptoms being referred to a psychologist for an assessment which identified the ESPs requiring trauma therapy. At the end of the therapy, the symptoms of the ESPs were re-assessed, and the scores before and after the therapy were compared.

Results: The results showed a significant improvement in the level of symptoms, with 81% of ESPs no longer exhibiting clinically significant trauma symptoms and 6% showing an increase in symptoms. In addition, the clinical results also showed improvements in ESPs’ perceived work capacity and quality of social relationships.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that there are clinical and personal benefits to using an organizationally based short-term model of trauma therapy in an emergency service setting.”

—Description from publisher

Article Access

Open Access

Tehrani, N. (2019). Evaluation of a trauma therapy programme within emergency service organizations. Occupational Medicine (London), 69(8-9), 559-565. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqz111