Scientific resistance to research, training and utilization of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in treating post-war disorders

The implications of sustained resistance to EMDR for combat veterans and other trauma sufferers are discussed.

Article Abstract

“In this study, Barber’s [(1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596-602] analysis of scientists’ resistance to discoveries is examined in relation to an 18-year controversy between the dominant cognitive-behavioral paradigm or zeitgeist and its chief rival – eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in treating trauma-related disorders. Reasons for persistent opposition to training, utilization and research into an identified ‘evidence-based treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder’ (EBT-PTSD) within US military and veterans’ agencies closely parallels Barber’s description of resistance based upon socio-cultural factors and scientific bias versus genuine scientific skepticism. The implications of sustained resistance to EMDR for combat veterans and other trauma sufferers are discussed. A unified or super-ordinate goal is offered to reverse negative trends impacting current and future mental healthcare of military personnel, veterans and other trauma survivors, and to bridge the scientific impasse.”

—Description from publisher

Article Access

Purchase/Subscription Required

Russell, M.C. (2008). Scientific resistance to research, training and utilization of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in treating post-war disorders. Social Science & Medicine, 67(11), 1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.025