Dismantling psychological interventions for youth with complex trauma: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological intervention RCTs (including EMDR) for children and adolescents with complex trauma.
Article Abstract
“Introduction: Complex trauma-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbidities pose a significant mental health burden in children. However, the comparative effectiveness of psychological interventions and shared therapeutic components remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review, network, and component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for children and adolescents with complex trauma. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2024. PTSD was the primary outcome; retention and comorbid symptoms (depression, anxiety, dissociation, externalizing problems) were secondary outcomes.
Results: Forty-eight studies (6,017 participants) were included in this review. Multimodal group interventions (SMD −1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.04 to −0.32), phase-based trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) with parental involvement (−1.12, −1.53 to −0.70), TF-CBT (−1.06, −1.59 to −0.52), non-TF-CBT with parental involvement (−0.93, −1.70 to −0.17), eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (−0.85, −1.60 to −0.10), and phase-based TF-CBT (−0.79, −1.20 to −0.39) significantly reduced PTSD. Exposure emerged as the only significantly effective component for PTSD (−0.85, 95% credible interval [CrI] −1.60 to −0.06). Efficient component combinations included affective modulation with a therapeutic foundation of psychoeducation and nonspecific elements for PTSD (−0.97, 95% CrI −1.92 to −0.01) and exposure plus parental involvement with the same foundation for depression (−2.11, 95% CrI −4.06 to −0.20).
Conclusion: Trauma-focused approaches were the most effective treatments for pediatric PTSD and emotional comorbidities related to complex trauma. A more cost-effective intervention approach may prioritize exposure techniques, incorporate affective modulation, and include parental involvement when feasible.”
—Description from publisher
Article Access
Open Access
Li, Y., Feng, J., Hu, W., Zeng, Z., Pan, Q., Wang, J., Li, M., Elbert, T., Karl, A., & Zang, Y. (2026). Dismantling psychological interventions for youth with complex trauma: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag009(opens in new tab)
Date
October 8, 2026
Creator(s)
Yu Li, Junkai Feng, Wanyan Hu
Contributor(s)
Zhuo Zeng, Qian Pan, Jun Wang, Muyang Li, Thomas Elbert, Anke Karl, Yinyin Zang
Topics
Childhood Trauma, Complex Trauma/C-PTSD
Client Population
Adolescents, Children
Practice & Methods
Comparative Studies
Extent
14 pages
Publisher
Karger
Rights
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by S. Karger AG. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
APA Citation
Li, Y., Feng, J., Hu, W., Zeng, Z., Pan, Q., Wang, J., Li, M., Elbert, T., Karl, A., & Zang, Y. (2026). Dismantling psychological interventions for youth with complex trauma: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag009
Audience
EMDR Therapists, Other Mental Health Professionals
Language
English
Content Type
Article, Meta-analyses/Systematic Reviews, Peer-Reviewed
Access Type
External Resource, Open Access